« June 2005 | Main | October 2005 »
August 17, 2005
Difference between Indian & American electorate
Americans expect in their presidents what they themselves don't practice in their private lives. Indians excuse their political leaders for errors which they don't themselves tolerate in their own private lives.
Posted by nachiketa at 03:31 PM | Comments (0)
August 10, 2005
Bandler & the Buddha (version posted to alt.psychology.nlp on 8/10/2005)
Abstract: The author tries to connect the NLP and Vipassana style of meditation. The author argues that all the NLP modalities are not born equal. The contention is that the Kinesthetic is the primal modality through which rest of the modalities (Visual and Audio) express. By elevating the kinesthetic modality to primary position, there are new implications for NLP.
Introduction to NLP
I don't think, I need to give an introduction of NLP to the audience of this newsgroup. But I want to stress some of the NLP terms which are of interest to my discussion below.
We know that there are at least three primary modalities: A (audio), V (video), K (kinesthetic). Each of the modalities has further submodalities.
Different people are good at different modalities. Some people experience the world intensely through Visual modality while others in Auditory. For one person, it could be V > A > K which means Video is more primary than Audio which is more primary than Kinesthetic. But for somebody else, this order could be A > V > K.
The main insight of the NLP is that by manipulating the submodalities of the experience, you could reduce the hold of that experience on you. Say you are scared of spiders or roller coaster rides; you can sit down and analyse the modality & submodalities of the experience. As soon as you think of roller coaster ride, you may have been visualizing certain video in your head. Analyse the pictures and video to see where it is located in your head, what color is it in, whether it is moving fast or slow etc. Now by manipulating these submodalities, you can loosen the fear of rides or the fear of the spiders.
Where NLP got it right?
The basic insights on modalities and the techniques developed out of modality manipulation for self-help were the greatest things. Techniques like swish pattern were very successful in helping people.
Where NLP went wrong?
To get the best out of NLP, it needs the help of external therapist. The NLP does not have in-built rigorous discipline to be used by an individual by himself. It requires the intervention of an external therapist who interprets, articulates and leads you to a solution.
NLP as a self-help tool failed since it lacked the formal inbuilt discipline needed for a serious spiritual/self-help path. To use any of the techniques (e.g. Swish Pattern) for self-help, it requires an enormous amount of unbiased objective analysis of oneself. (For me, after 3 years of experimentation with NLP, the addiction only turned into more & more reading of NLP literature rather than working to fix my problems. I felt at some point that I needed help from a therapist to make better progress).
It is very tough to use NLP to cure some of the deeper psychological complexes like “existential anxiety”.
A new model of NLP
My feeling is that NLP got wrong in understanding the representational systems or the modalities (A, V, K). All three modalities are not different. There is only one primary modality, which is Kinesthetic. All other modalities express themselves through Kinesthetic. My insight is based on my experience with Vipassana style of meditation. You just need to work on your K (kinesthetic) modality to fix any problem. However, the kinesthetic is the subtlest of all modalities. I try to explain below why Kinesthetic is the primary one.
Introduction to Vipassana
Vipassana is the meditation technique used by Theravada style of Buddhism. The Vipassana meditation consists of working on your bodily sensations to liberate your mind.
Vipassana is taught generally in a 10-day course. The first three days consists of focusing your awareness on your breath. By the end of the three days, the mind gets so acute that one will be able to observe the subtlest bodily kinesthetic sensations. After these three days, the student is taught to focus on the sensations throughout the body instead of just nasal area. The main thing is to develop equanimity to the bodily kinesthetic sensations.
Equanimity is what gives you the results. You are asked not to focus on the individual thoughts; you are not supposed to analyse the connection between a particular individual thought and the kinesthetic sensations thereof. The 10-day program basically instills the discipline to experience the bodily sensations without reacting to them. It is a very tough and hard work but if you do your work diligently, you can see that the deeper mental complexes evaporating from your mind.
Do we need a 10-day course to learn Vipassana? Can't we learn it just by reading a book? Possibly not. The path is so hard that anybody would need at least one 10-day course to instill the discipline and to appreciate the proper intent of the technique.
Theory behind Vipassana
We need to understand the Chain of Conditioned Arising or Causal Genesis to learn why & how the Vipassana technique works.
There are four mental processes or aggregates (khandha) which give rise to whole process of how our thinking process works (as per Theravada Buddhism):
1) Consciousness (Vinnana): The first process of the mind is the receiving part, which registers the occurrence of any input, physical or mental. It notes the raw data of experience without assigning labels. This is where you receive all the experiences of the world through your senses. You hear something or see something. There is no judgment of whether this is good or bad. Your friend just uttered some words but you haven't judged those words.
2) Perception/Recognition (Sanna): This is where you make judgment of the registered raw data. In the previous process, you merely heard or saw something in raw terms. But now in the current step, you are making judgment, assign labels & categories, evaluate whether it is good or bad. The words uttered by your friend in the previous process are evaluated now and are labeled as either they are good words or bad words. It basically filters the raw input and presents a colored image of the reality. This judgment process itself is conditioned by one's past experience. We are evaluating the current raw input based on our past-accumulated reactions.
3) Kinesthetic sensations or feeling (Vedana): This is the subtlest of all four processes. A kinesthetic sensation or feeling arises in the body as soon as the first step happened i.e. as soon as the raw input is received. So long as the second process of evaluation of the input has not happened, the sensation remained neutral. But once a value is attached to the raw input, the kinesthetic sensation turns pleasant or unpleasant. The kinesthetic sensation is the bridge between mental and physical experience but itself is rooted in the physical body.
4) Reaction (Sankhara): If the kinesthetic sensation is pleasant, we wish to prolong or intensify the experience. If it is unpleasant, we wish to stop it. The mind reacts with liking or disliking. We are merely reacting to the bodily Kinesthetic Sensations (Vedana) but such a reaction is so powerful that it determines our future conditioning to the experience. The greatest insight to take is that we are not really reacting to the valuation we gave in the second step (i.e. whether your friend's uttering were praise or abuse), but rather we are reacting to the physical kinesthetic sensations manifested in third step. The new Sankharas form the basis by which you will judge and evaluate the future raw inputs. And thus the cycle of conditioning continues.
Now what? We keep going through this loop of forming new Sankharas; and the Chain of Conditioned Arising continues in a loop. But here comes the insight of the Vipassana. By learning to observe the Kinesthetic Sensations (Vedana) objectively and not reacting to them, one can break the chain of conditioned response. Basically we are breaking the conditioning of the registered experience forever. The Perception/Recognition (Sanna) instead turns into Wisdom (Vinnana).
You are not supposed to focus on the thoughts but instead on the sensations. It is very difficult to link what thoughts caused what physical sensations. But that is the origin of discipline in Vipassana. Normally it is very tough to focus on thoughts for novices to try tracing them to the resulting kinesthetic sensations. (But I believe, one can learn such prowess as one practices more & more).
Why is the technique so subtle and why is it not so
self-evident? Everybody needs an explanation of why and how a technique works. But the Vipassana is an experiential technique, not an intellectual experience. You don't need to understand how it works to get the benefits. Even my explanation of the technique is only an approximation. One only needs to go through the 10-day course to experience the benefits of it.
NLP & Vipassana
Have you ever done a yoga asana on a stressful day? A single yoga asana seems to relax the stress and get you into good moods. Even the tai chi focuses on bodily kinesthetic movements as a spiritual tool. The salvation lies in the human body. The kinesthetic sensations talked about in Vipassana are nothing but the knots in our psychosomatic field.
There is one subtle difference in NLP and Vipassana. Vipassana never focuses on an individual thought and resultant kinesthetic sensations. It is not humanly possible for a novice to connect the individual thoughts and the resulting the kinesthetic sensations. Vipassana frowns upon such an experiment itself. But I believe, once the practitioner gains more experiences, it is possible to do such thing. The NLP addresses a certain particular psychological problem while the Vipassana addresses the deeper complexes. I don't think, it is possible to fix your phobia of spiders in a Vipassana sitting. But a deeper surgery of psychological complexes is only possible in Vipassana.
NLP indulges in an analytical approach to identify the root causes of the problem. In Vipassana however, the fact that you are uncomfortable with a certain thing is good enough. Rest is the hard work of equanimously observing the physical sensations without reacting. The underlying complex reasons come up the surface and evaporate by the exercise. You are expected to hold your equanimity during the meditation; neither crave for more of the similar sensations nor run away from them. Otherwise you are only strengthening the conditioning.
What is next?
There is need for more research into kinesthetic modality as the tool for NLP. I would urge the NLP community to give a try of Vipassana mediation. I believe, Vipassana can nicely complement the work of NLP or even replace NLP as the ultimate spiritual tool. If you want to experience the technique, one can sign up for a free course at http://www.dhamma.org/. The course itself is free. You can also check out my blog http://www.nachiketa.org/ for other related information.
Posted by nachiketa at 05:12 PM | Comments (0)
August 05, 2005
What's next for human body ?
I believe, the human evolution has stopped. The animals & plants have evolved to work around the problems forced upon them by nature. The last species of animals (i.e. we the humans) happens to be more intelligent than previous species; the humans invented the tools to circumvent the nature's problems. By inventing the tools, we in a way stopped our own evolution. By building houses, by inventing agriculture, by inventing medicine, we have more or less broke away from our dependance on the natural forces. What now for humans ?
If we need to evolve further, the only way seems to be tweaking our bodies to invent a new species.
I am unabashed posthumanist. Here are some of my posthumanist fantasies regarding the human body. Nothing in the human existence and human condition is sanctimonious to me. I believe that the following of my dreams are going to happen at some point in human history.
Lost time in sleep
We need to take the sleep out of human existence. Sleep has had its role in human evolution but I believe, there is no more need for the sleep in human life. Currently I don't think, we for sure understand the reasons for sleep. The darkness of the nights may have been one reason for the existence of sleep; the humanity did conquer the darkness by inventing the power to create light at will in nights. The sleep may have been meant to give rest to physical body. It could be there for human mind to rest and reorganize the memories. But there are so many passive activities in human life now which could safely work as replenishments for body and mind. We should tweak the human body to remove the need for sleep safely without endangering the human life.
A better sex
It is time to take a relook at the sex in human life. If sex was only meant for procreation, there is no need for humans to involve in sex for non-reproductive reasons. The sex has a stronger role in human evolution. Possibly the human child needs such a long rearing, the sex may have been chosen by evolution as the tool for building family platform for child rearing.
The sex needs to be freed from the genitals. We need to tweak the human body to invent a new form of sex which is as powerful as sex but not really associated with genitals. Why did the evolution pick genitals so close to excretory parts (which are meant for discharging waste products from the body)? Why did it not invent a new body part independent of the excretory body parts ?
The "new sex" needs to be doable say by handshaking or rubbing noses or kissing. Say that it needs be freed between the male and female. Imagine, if we can get the orgasmic pleasure just by handshaking or rubbing hands in a particular order, the sex need not be any more between a man and a woman.
The "new sex" can be more powerful than the current sex. It can be invented to create harmony in the society. It need not be called by the name "sex" as such; we could call it by any other name. But it got to be more powerful and liberating than current sex.
The current sex has murky relationship with guilt & sin in any society. The "new sex" needs to be freed from the concept of guilt and sin.
Woman's body
The contraceptive has been such a liberating tool for women. The next advancement for woman would be to take the womb out of woman. Rearing the fetus in a lab is not far from reality. What about even taking out the menstruation out of woman ? These would have far better implications for woman emancipation.
The sneaky germs
Nature did a poor job in protecting the human body from the vagaries of bacteria & virus. Why do the bacteria & virus have to be so sneaky ? If a predator like lion is coming to eat me, I could see it and run away from it or take some protection from it. But the bacteria & virus are so sneaky in hijacking the body that we are at the mercy of the fate. We need to close the bodies for all microorganisms.
Self-repairing body
After closing the body for germs, next thing is to address the self-healing and self-repair of the body. Lizards can grow back their tails if cut. Even human liver can grow back to full size if it is cut to half. We need similar abilities for all of the human body parts so that they can repair, heal and regrow back to their functionality.
Specter of death
Another fantasy is to increase the longevity of human life. Yes, I would like to live to 1000 years. Lot of people are so unimaginative when they ask "why would I want to live 1000 years with a crippled old body?". Well, if we can increase the longevity, why can't we repair the crippled body ? It is well possible to imagine to live forever with the same healthy physical body which never deteriorates.
Some people object saying there wouldn't be enough place for people on the earth if everybody lives. Ask the same people if they want to die a natural death if there is really a cure for death. Ask them if they want to die tomorrow to make little more space on earth. Well, I too don't know where to make space for all the people if everybody start living. But we got to be creative to come up with solutions. Whether we could find the solution or not, there are enough people motivated to realize the dream of living forever.
Satiation
I am such a food lover, I would love to enjoy the taste of a favorite dish for a long long time. Currently after I eat for a while, the satiation kicks in and it does not taste any longer the same. But imagine, there is a toggle switch on the esophagus to divert the food to an external invented body sac. Whenever I am eating for pleasure, it just accumulates into this sac instead of going to my stomach. Now I can enjoy the food so long that I stop eating only when my jaws are tired of chewing.
I know, it seems so blasphemous to talk of food in these manner where there are people dying of starvation in this world. But I believe, the starvation is an artifact of failed social institutions which I believe can be corrected if only we try to solve it. There is enough technology now to create manifold of food for the masses of the world.
Sensibilities & Objections
These preposterous fantasies may definitely offend the sensibilities of lot of people. But I believe, these sensibilities are product of culture & time we are living in. My belief is that these would erode over a period of time.
I would like to think anybody's objections against my ideas are like those of people who objected to the invention of agriculture. Imagine the first man who invented the agriculture. This person instead of depending on the natural forest for food started domesticating the plants and growing them. I would think that the rest of the humanity would have felt offended at this person for violating the will of God by growing those sacred trees whenever and wherever he liked.
One of my friends said, "well, what you are talking are artificial things". I don't think anything is artificial. You can't create any artificial things which violate the natural laws. We only harvest the nature's existing laws to invent a new things. Of course, there are good harvests & bad harvests. We need to conduct a productive discourse before abandoning anything as harmful to the human evolution.
I find another sort of defense from people who keep explaining the reasons for status quo. They present all sorts of facts for the way things are in this world. They explain why sleep helps body or why the sex is the way it is. They explain how death needs to be there to make a way for new generations. Well, I am not looking for explanation of the way things are. I want to go meta or beyond the way things are. I would like to label these defenses as "argument from ignorance" or "argument by lack of imagination".
Posted by nachiketa at 03:25 PM | Comments (0)
Afraid not, to tread
The journey of thousand miles starts with a single step. But even before the step, it starts with a dream. The dream guides where you need to go. If you don't know where you are going, it does not matter where you go.
Afraid not, to dream.
After having figured out where you need to go, it would be a huge waste of effort if you don't take the first step now.
Afraid not, to tread.
Afraid not, to dream. Afraid not, to tread.
Posted by nachiketa at 02:35 PM | Comments (0)